Every platform gave you an AI that acts. Jurnies gives you an AI that answers for the result.

accountable AI for marketing and commerce

Every platform gave you an AI that acts. Jurnies gives you an AI that answers for the result.

Joe drafts a full strategic plan from your own data — your real margins, your channel performance, your customer sentiment, your visibility in AI search. You edit it. You ratify it. From that moment every email, ad, journey and promotion Joe runs is bound to an objective in that plan.

Illustration — the tolerance-band motif from our own design system. The live Plan-cockpit visual replaces it when the cockpit surface ships; we don't mock screens we haven't built.
Joe — at restat rest
Joe — listeninglistening
Joe — draftingdrafting
Joe — verifiedverified
Joe — flaggedflagged
Joe — paused by youpaused by you
One plan. One brain. One customer record. One journey canvas. One commerce engine. One ledger. One truth.
One platform, everything included, nothing to integrate. We do not apologise for breadth — we name the ten-tool fatigue and end it. One bill, one customer record, one brain.

Joe drafts. You ratify. Joe answers for it.

Joe drafts.

Joe auto-drafts the Situation analysis from data you already own: ledger margins, channel performance across ads, social, email, SMS and chat, review sentiment, and AI-search citation share. Point solutions cannot generate this, because they do not own the data.

You ratify.

The plan is a typed, compiled, decision-binding SOSTAC artifact. You edit it and you ratify it. You stay the strategist — Joe owns the execution.

Joe answers for it.

Every action carries a plan binding and an audit trail. The platform scores reality against the plan continuously. When reality deviates, Joe tells you, explains why, and proposes the revision — before you have to ask.
a strategy is in force here

the evidence, not the headline

Verification

Every Joe output is verified before delivery, and verification depth is sold transparently as an SLA — not asserted as a vibe. Joe is verified; Joe is never “can't be wrong.”

AI visibility

We measure and grow your citation share in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. Run the grader on your own domain before you speak to us.

Cost transparency

You'll see exactly what your account costs us. Honest margins make for businesses that last.

Architecture as proof

FORCED row-level-security multi-tenancy, per-decision provenance, and jurnies.com running as a tenant on the platform itself. If Joe can't run jurnies.com on Jurnies, we have shipped the wrong product.

one platform, everything included

Nothing to integrate, because there's nothing missing.

Sovereign commerce engine
Storefront + checkout
Every marketing channel
Journey canvas
Loyalty
Affiliates
Content
Reviews
Analytics
A real general ledger

Three honest questions

What does “answers for the result” actually mean?

It means Joe works from a strategy you ratified, measures itself against that plan, and comes back to say: we're behind on this objective, here's why, here's my proposed revision. An agent that acts is not accountable. An employee that reports against a plan is.

What is the plan, exactly?

A typed, compiled, decision-binding SOSTAC artifact that Joe drafts, you ratify, every platform decision consults, the BI service scores continuously, and Joe is answerable to. It is the instrument, not a document.

Do you run your own business on this?

Yes. This page is rendered by Jurnies, on Jurnies, as a tenant — the same block library, the same registry, the same renderer a customer's page uses. If Joe can't run jurnies.com on Jurnies, we have shipped the wrong product. Everything we claim, we publish the numbers for.

We run our own businesses on it.

Everything we claim, we publish the numbers for — including the misses. Read the quarterly transparency report before you decide anything.